Fields with asterisks* are required. Please email our helpful staff with any questions or comments using the contact form.
Use the Loan Calculator to help you determine the financing and payment options that are best for you.
**The accuracy of this calculator and its applicability to your circumstances is not guaranteed. You should obtain personal advice from qualified professionals. This information is provided for illustrative purposes only and does not constitute an application. This notice does not guarantee loan approval, nor is it an offer or commitment to make a loan to you on the above terms.
The X9 combine has been optimized to handle the extreme wear conditions a rice harvest can bring about. By utilizing the most advanced coatings and wear resistant materials, the X9 combine is built to last longer and do more.
The X Series helps reduce fuel costs by 20 percent per bushel harvested. Plus, you can count on an improved grain tank sample and better residue spread, which adds up over a harvest season. With this improved design, you can harvest more acres per day with improved fuel consumption.
If you ever wished you could harvest a few more acres per day, the X Series Combines is the right choice for you. More capacity – up to a 70 percent increase on the X9 1100 – means you can cover a lot more ground with improved grain quality and less grain loss.
Crop type | S790 | X9 1000 | X9 1100 |
Harvesting capacity (percent above an S790) |
|||
Tough wheat | 100 percent | 134 percent | 170 percent |
Canola | 100 percent | 135 percent | 140 percent |
High-moisture corn | 100 percent | 130 percent | 150 percent |
Soybeans | 100 percent | 130 percent | 145 percent |
Combine capacity, time, and money - what are they worth to you? In late September and early October of 2020, John Deere contracted PAMI (Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute) to conduct independent benchmarking of the John Deere X9 1100 Combine versus the CLAAS 8800 Combine. PAMI tested these combines in tough wheat and canola conditions in Western Canada, and what they found was impressive. Read the full PAMI reports at https://pami.ca/annual-reports.
In 102 bu/acre wheat, PAMI found the X9 1100 Combine had a 28 percent capacity advantage over the CLAAS 8800 at a 1 percent total loss threshold (figure 10 of the PAMI report). Considering a farm with 8,000 acres of wheat, here is a breakdown of how a John Deere X9 Combine would compare to a CLAAS 8800 when harvesting wheat at 1 percent loss:
Harvesting wheat at 1 percent loss |
X9 1100 |
CLAAS 8800 |
X9 1100 |
|
Total throughput (tonnes/hr) |
115 |
90 |
25 |
More tonnes/hr |
Combine capacity (bu/hr) |
2,306 |
1,801 |
505 |
More bu/hr |
Productivity (acres/hr) |
18 |
14 |
4 |
More acres/hr |
Productivity (acres/14-hour day) |
253 |
198 |
55 |
More acres/day |
Machine depreciation (dollars/acre) |
$19.75 |
$25.28 |
$5.53 |
Savings per acre |
Operator cost at $30/hr (dollars/acre) |
$18,960 |
$24,270 |
$0.66 |
Savings per acre |
Total fleet value depreciation |
$157,997 |
$202,238 |
$44,241 |
In depreciation saved |
Days of harvest needed (14-hour days) with two machines |
22.57 |
28.89 |
6.3 |
Fewer harvest days |
With a John Deere X9 Combine, you can simply harvest more acres in less time and with less grain loss. In fact, as you can calculate from the PAMI testing results, the X9 Combine can save you 6.3 total harvest days when compared to the CLAAS 8800 in a two-machine harvest scenario. This is essentially a week of time saved in the field with your combines. A lot can happen in one week, including rain storms that reduce your wheat’s test weight or snow storms that can prolong your harvest and make for very difficult harvesting conditions in the future. An X9 combine helps you manage this risk by enabling a faster and cost-saving wheat harvest, so you can get into other crops such as canola and pulses much earlier.
In addition to getting your crop out of the field faster, an X9 Combine also directly saves you money by requiring less time to do the same amount of work. The X9 can save you $0.66 per acre in operator time and $5.53 per acre in depreciation savings, for a total savings of up to $6.19 per acre when running at 1 percent loss.
Everything discussed until this point has been at a 1 percent loss rate. Let’s say storms are in the forecast and you need to get your wheat crop off the field as fast as possible. An X9 Combine is up to that task as well. When PAMI tested both machines to a power limit condition (figure 10 of the PAMI wheat report), here’s what they found:
Harvesting wheat at power limit |
X9 1100 |
CLAAS 8800 |
X9 1100 |
|
Grain loss (percent/acre) |
2 |
6 |
4 |
Percent less loss per acre |
Grain loss value (dollars/acre) |
$12.04 |
$36.11 |
$24.07 |
Savings per acre |
At power limit, the X9 1100 never exceeded 2 percent loss, and the CLAAS 8800 reached a 6 percent loss rate. When you need to get your crop off the field as fast as possible, the X9 can save you up to $24.07 per acre compared to the CLAAS 8800. Additionally, more available power would not have helped the CLAAS 8800 close this gap, since the 8800’s loss rate was already increasing at a higher rate compared to the X9 1100. If rain or snow is in the forecast or if you are short on time, an X9 Combine can deliver outstanding performance in tough conditions as demonstrated in the results of the PAMI testing.
Harvesting canola |
X9 1100 |
CLAAS 8800 |
X9 1100 |
|
Total throughput (tonnes/hr) at 3 percent loss |
63 |
63 |
Equal |
Tonnes/hr |
Total capacity (bu/hr) at 3 percent loss |
1,152 |
1,152 |
Equal |
bu/hr |
Maximum throughput achieved (tonnes/hr) |
89 |
73 |
16 |
More tonnes/hr |
Fuel consumption (gal./100 bu) |
1.96 |
2.38 |
18 |
Percent less fuel per bushel |
When PAMI tested the machines in canola, both machines performed well in tough conditions. Each machine reached a total throughput of 63 tonnes/hr or 1,152 bu/hr at a 3 percent loss rate. However, the X9 1100 used 18 percent less fuel per bushel harvested than the CLAAS 8800 in these tests. When you consider this on a farm with 4,000 acres of canola, you’d save over 1,227 gal. of fuel or $0.79 per acre. PAMI also mentions that machine noise and distress were limiting factors on how hard the machines could be pushed in these conditions, and the X9 1100 could be ran at a higher throughput (see figure 10 of the PAMI canola report). This again speaks to the performance of X9 Combines when needing to harvest in the toughest conditions.
More acres in less time and with less cost is what the independent PAMI benchmarking results prove you get when you purchase a John Deere X9 Combine. Reach out to your John Deere dealer to learn more about how the X9 Combine can help you be more successful in your operation.
The examples provided here are based on the yields and conditions where the independent PAMI benchmarking took place. Actual values will vary depending on your conditions, yields, machine count, and operational efficiencies. Here is a summary of the values used:
CLAAS is a trademark of CLAAS KGaA mbH.
You want the ability to be more productive early in the morning when the crop is tougher and later in the evening as the dew settles. With the X Series, no matter what condition your fields are in, it keeps performing like it’s the middle of the day. More importantly, the combine stretches the length of the harvest window, allowing you to get in the fields sooner and stay later than before, without risking a loss in productivity or grain quality.
All X9 Combines provide a quiet, comfortable ride with visibility, control, and convenience that are even better than previous John Deere cabs. Choose from three comfort and convenience packages to find a cab that fits you best.
iPad is a trademark of Apple Inc.
Make business decisions with the integrated technologies in the X Series. The combine learns on the go to improve your harvest, reduce losses, and leave cleaner grain. You’ll collect more accurate data, improve harvest results with automation, and make more informed decisions by connecting all your machines. What’s even better, the X9 Combines do much of this automatically in the background.
Engine type | John Deere PowerTech™ PWS 13.6 L 830 cu in. |
---|---|
Rated power | 410 kW 549 hp |
Fuel capacity | 1249.2 L 330 gal. |
Rotor length | 3.51 m 11.5 ft |
Rotor diameter | 60.1 cm 24 in. |
Concave area | 1.6 m2 17.22 sq ft |
Separating area | 3.6 m2 38.75 sq ft |
Total cleaning area (louvered) | 6.97 m2 75.02 sq ft |
Grain tank size | 14,800 L 420 bu |
Peak unloading rate | 162 L/s 4.6 bu/sec |
Channel width | |
Threshing cylinder diameter |
Engine type | John Deere PowerTech PWS 13.6 L 830 cu in. |
---|---|
Emission level | Final Tier 4 (FT4) |
Rated speed | 1900 rpm |
Rated power | 410 kW 549 hp |
Maximum power | 470 kW 630 hp |
Power boost @ rated speed | 39.5 kW 53 hp |
Fuel capacity | 1249.2 L 330 gal. |
Engine family | PowerTech |
Drive type | Fixed or variable speed |
---|---|
Conveyor chain slat type | Four-strand chain with formed steel slats |
Width | 1720 mm 67.7 in. |
Length | |
Feed Accelerator, Stone Trap (FAST) | Reverser Modulated feederhouse reverser Eight-wing chevron FAST |
Separator type | Dual rotor |
---|---|
Rotor length | 3.51 m 11.5 ft |
Rotor diameter | 60.1 cm 24 in. |
Rotor speed range | 300 to 1300 rpm |
Concave area | 1.6 m2 17.22 sq ft |
Separating area | 3.6 m2 38.75 sq ft |
Discharge grate area | 0.4508 m2 4.85 sq ft |
Separator drum diameter | |
Separator drum speed | |
Threshing cylinder speed range |
Front chaffer | 0.97 m2 10.4 sq ft |
---|---|
Front chaffer extension | |
Pre cleaning | |
Chaffer | 3.13 m2 33.69 sq ft |
Sieve area | 2.87 m2 30.89 sq ft |
Total cleaning area (louvered) | 6.97 m2 75.02 sq ft |
Cleaning fan speed | 570 to 1430 rpm |
Grain tank size | 14,800 L 420 bu |
---|---|
Unloading auger length | 7.9, 8.7, or 9.45 m 26, 28.5, or 31 ft |
Peak unloading rate | 162 L/s 4.6 bu/sec |
Total machine |
---|
Country | United States |
---|
Date collected | 15 June 2020 |
---|
Copyright © 2024 King Ranch Ag & Turf All Rights Reserved. Website by EquipmentLocator.com